WritingmateWritingmate
Model Comparison

FLUX Video Upscale vs Gemma 3 27BWhich Is Better in 2026?

Black Forest Labs: FLUX Video Upscale logoBlack Forest Labs•Google: Gemma 3 27B logoGoogle

FLUX Video Upscale vs Gemma 3 27B: which should you choose in 2026?

FLUX Video Upscale (by Black Forest Labs) and Gemma 3 27B (by Google) are compared below. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price, and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

There are not enough shared, protocol-compatible benchmark results to declare a performance leader.

Choose FLUX Video Upscale if…

  • • you need video generation

Choose Gemma 3 27B if…

  • • you need image inputs

The benchmark count includes only results measured with a matching benchmark version and protocol. Arena scores are shown separately. Missing, preliminary, and incompatible data is not treated as a controlled win. Published point-score comparisons are labeled separately when protocol details are incomplete. For text-output models, the verdict also compares token pricing and context windows.

Chat with both models
vs

Performance benchmarks

Every value links to its source. A dash means that no reviewed result is available for that exact model and protocol.

FLUX Video Upscale and Gemma 3 27B benchmark results
BenchmarkFLUX Video UpscaleGemma 3 27B
AutomationBench-AA

A 657-task benchmark of multi-step work across simulated SaaS applications in six business domains. The Artificial Analysis protocol reports a guardrail-aware score and is distinct from both the public Zapier split and the unrelated dynamic AutoBench framework.

Guardrail-aware score

——
BrowseComp

A benchmark of difficult, verifiable information-seeking questions designed to measure an agent's ability to locate hard-to-find facts through web browsing.

Accuracy

——
OSWorld-Verified

A verified computer-use benchmark in which multimodal agents operate desktop applications and are graded from the resulting environment state.

Mean task reward

——
SWE-Bench Verified

A human-validated subset of real GitHub issues used to measure whether a coding agent can produce repository patches that resolve the associated tests.

Resolved

——
Terminal-Bench 2.1

Version 2.1 of the benchmark for completing realistic tasks in terminal environments. Harness, resource limits, and attempt count are part of the protocol.

Mean task success

——
AutoBench

A dynamic LLM evaluation framework in which models generate questions, answer them, and participate in reciprocal peer assessment. AutoBench is distinct from Zapier's AutomationBench.

Weighted peer-assessment score

——
GPQA Diamond

The highest-quality subset of Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A, designed to test expert-level scientific reasoning in biology, physics, and chemistry.

Accuracy

——
Humanity's Last Exam

A 2,500-question expert-level benchmark spanning dozens of academic fields. Tool-assisted and no-tools results are separate protocols and must not be merged.

Accuracy

——
Arena preference scores
Arena (Text)

Human preference score

—
1366 ±4

Benchmark sources

Reviewed evidence last updated 2026-08-09. Arena data last refreshed Aug 23, 2026.

Pricing, capabilities, and model facts

FLUX Video Upscale and Gemma 3 27B model facts
FeatureFLUX Video UpscaleGemma 3 27B
Context & model facts
DeveloperBlack Forest LabsGoogle
API providerBlack Forest LabsGoogle
Input context—262,144 tokens
Maximum output—131,072 tokens
Released——
Added to WritingmateAug 19, 2026Mar 12, 2025
LicenseNot availableNot available
Knowledge cutoff—2024-08-31
Capabilities
InputsText, VideoText, Image
OutputsVideoText
Provider endpoint accepts tool parametersNoYes
ReasoningNoNo
VisionNoYes
Image GenerationNoNo
Video GenerationYesNo
API performance
p95 latencyNot measuredNot measured
Output throughputNot measuredNot measured
Writingmate shows API performance only when both models have enough observations from the same measurement window, prompt profile, and provider. Third-party latency values are not copied into this table.

Data sources

  • Writingmate model catalog (pricing, limits, and availability)

Catalog data last updated Aug 19, 2026.

Why Pay for Multiple Subscriptions?

Comparing FLUX Video Upscale from Black Forest Labs with Gemma 3 27B from Google? Instead of managing separate API keys and subscriptions, get both with Writingmate.

Subscription-plan access for FLUX Video Upscale and Gemma 3 27B
PlanPriceFLUX Video UpscaleGemma 3 27BAI ImagesAI Video
Writingmate Pro
Most popular
$20/moIncludedIncludedNano Banana Pro, FLUX.2, DALL-E & moreSora 2, VEO 3.1
Writingmate Ultimate
Power users
$60/moIncludedIncludedNano Banana Pro, FLUX.2, DALL-E & moreSora 2, VEO 3.1
View Plans & Pricing

FLUX Video Upscale vs Gemma 3 27B FAQ

Which is better, FLUX Video Upscale or Gemma 3 27B?

There are not enough shared, protocol-compatible benchmark results to declare a performance leader.

Which model is cheaper to use through an API?

A comparable blended token price is not available for both models. Check the API pricing rows for the values that are currently published.

Which model supports more context?

Comparable context-window data is not available for both models.

Can I switch between FLUX Video Upscale and Gemma 3 27B?

Yes. Use the model selector on this page to open any current Writingmate model comparison. You can also run the same prompt with both models in Writingmate.