Seedance 2.0 Mini vs MiniMax M3: which should you choose in 2026?
Seedance 2.0 Mini (by ByteDance) and MiniMax M3 (by MiniMax) are compared below. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price, and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.
There are not enough shared, protocol-compatible benchmark results to declare a performance leader.
Choose Seedance 2.0 Mini if…
- • you need video generation
Choose MiniMax M3 if…
- • you need a model with explicit reasoning support
The benchmark count includes only results measured with a matching benchmark version and protocol. Arena scores are shown separately. Missing, preliminary, and incompatible data is not treated as a controlled win. Published point-score comparisons are labeled separately when protocol details are incomplete. For text-output models, the verdict also compares token pricing and context windows.
Performance benchmarks
Every value links to its source. A dash means that no reviewed result is available for that exact model and protocol.
| Benchmark | Seedance 2.0 Mini | MiniMax M3 |
|---|---|---|
A 657-task benchmark of multi-step work across simulated SaaS applications in six business domains. The Artificial Analysis protocol reports a guardrail-aware score and is distinct from both the public Zapier split and the unrelated dynamic AutoBench framework. Guardrail-aware score | — | — |
A benchmark of difficult, verifiable information-seeking questions designed to measure an agent's ability to locate hard-to-find facts through web browsing. Accuracy | — | — |
A verified computer-use benchmark in which multimodal agents operate desktop applications and are graded from the resulting environment state. Mean task reward | — | 75.2% OSWorld |
A human-validated subset of real GitHub issues used to measure whether a coding agent can produce repository patches that resolve the associated tests. Resolved | — | — |
Version 2.1 of the benchmark for completing realistic tasks in terminal environments. Harness, resource limits, and attempt count are part of the protocol. Mean task success | — | — |
A dynamic LLM evaluation framework in which models generate questions, answer them, and participate in reciprocal peer assessment. AutoBench is distinct from Zapier's AutomationBench. Weighted peer-assessment score | — | — |
The highest-quality subset of Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A, designed to test expert-level scientific reasoning in biology, physics, and chemistry. Accuracy | — | 92.9% Artificial Analysis |
A 2,500-question expert-level benchmark spanning dozens of academic fields. Tool-assisted and no-tools results are separate protocols and must not be merged. Accuracy | — | 39.0% Artificial Analysis |
A contamination-resistant benchmark refreshed on a fixed release cadence. Scores from different LiveBench releases must never be compared as the same protocol. Mean of category averages | — | 67.3% LiveBench |
| Arena preference scores | ||
Human preference score | — | 1444 ±5 |
Human preference score for code and web development | — | 1490 ±7 |
Benchmark sources
- Arena AI leaderboard
- OSWorld-Verified Results
- GPQA Diamond Benchmark Leaderboard
- Humanity's Last Exam Benchmark Leaderboard
- LiveBench 2026-06-25 Leaderboard
Reviewed evidence last updated 2026-08-09. Arena data last refreshed Aug 19, 2026.
Pricing, capabilities, and model facts
| Feature | Seedance 2.0 Mini | MiniMax M3 |
|---|---|---|
| Context & model facts | ||
| Developer | ByteDance | MiniMax |
| API provider | ByteDance | MiniMax |
| Input context | — | 1,048,576 tokens |
| Maximum output | — | 512,000 tokens |
| Released | — | — |
| Added to Writingmate | Aug 12, 2026 | May 31, 2026 |
| License | Not available | Not available |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | — |
| Capabilities | ||
| Inputs | Text, Image, Video, Audio | Text, Image, Video |
| Outputs | Video | Text |
| Provider endpoint accepts tool parameters | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | No | Yes |
| Vision | Yes | Yes |
| Image Generation | No | No |
| Video Generation | Yes | No |
| API performance | ||
| p95 latency | Not measured | Not measured |
| Output throughput | Not measured | Not measured |
| Writingmate shows API performance only when both models have enough observations from the same measurement window, prompt profile, and provider. Third-party latency values are not copied into this table. | ||
Data sources
- Writingmate model catalog (pricing, limits, and availability)
Catalog data last updated Aug 12, 2026.
Why Pay for Multiple Subscriptions?
Comparing Seedance 2.0 Mini from ByteDance with MiniMax M3 from MiniMax? Instead of managing separate API keys and subscriptions, get both with Writingmate.
| Plan | Price | Seedance 2.0 Mini | MiniMax M3 | AI Images | AI Video |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Writingmate Pro Most popular | $20/mo | Included | Included | Nano Banana Pro, FLUX.2, DALL-E & more | Sora 2, VEO 3.1 |
Writingmate Ultimate Power users | $60/mo | Included | Included | Nano Banana Pro, FLUX.2, DALL-E & more | Sora 2, VEO 3.1 |
Seedance 2.0 Mini vs MiniMax M3 FAQ
Which is better, Seedance 2.0 Mini or MiniMax M3?
There are not enough shared, protocol-compatible benchmark results to declare a performance leader.
Which model is cheaper to use through an API?
A comparable blended token price is not available for both models. Check the API pricing rows for the values that are currently published.
Which model supports more context?
Comparable context-window data is not available for both models.
Can I switch between Seedance 2.0 Mini and MiniMax M3?
Yes. Use the model selector on this page to open any current Writingmate model comparison. You can also run the same prompt with both models in Writingmate.
Related comparisons
More Seedance 2.0 Mini comparisons
H3
MiniMax
MiniMax H3 is a lightweight, open-weights video generation model from MiniMax.
FLUX.3 Video
Black Forest Labs
FLUX.3 Video is a video generation model from Black Forest Labs.
Aleph 2.0
Runway
Runway Aleph 2.0 is an in-context video editing model from Runway.
Gen-4.5
Runway
Runway Gen-4.5 is a video generation model from Runway for text-to-video and image-to-video workflows.
Grok Imagine Video 1.5
xAI
Grok Imagine Video 1.5 is a video generation model from SpaceXAI.
HappyHorse 1.1
Alibaba
HappyHorse 1.1 is a video generation model from Alibaba.
More MiniMax M3 comparisons
Qwen3.8 27B
Qwen
Qwen3.8 27B is an open-weight dense vision-language model from Qwen.
Gemini 3.7 Flash
Gemini 3.7 Flash is a multimodal model from Google for fast agentic workflows, coding, and complex multi-step reasoning.
Seed 2.1 Turbo
ByteDance
Seed 2.1 Turbo is a multimodal model from ByteDance Seed for coding and long-horizon agent workflows.
Seed-2.0-Code
ByteDance
Seed 2.0 Code is a model from ByteDance Seed optimized for agentic coding.
Muse Spark 1.2
Meta
Muse Spark 1.2 is a reasoning model from Meta, designed for complex agentic tasks.
Qwen3.8 Max
Qwen
Qwen3.8 Max is the flagship model in Alibaba's Qwen3.8 series, the general-availability successor to the Qwen3.8 Max Preview.