Llama 4 Maverick vs Grok Imagine Video 1.5 Lite: which should you choose in 2026?
Llama 4 Maverick (by Meta) and Grok Imagine Video 1.5 Lite (by xAI) are compared below. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price, and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.
There are not enough shared, protocol-compatible benchmark results to declare a performance leader.
Choose Llama 4 Maverick if…
- • your own prompt tests favor its output; shared comparable evidence does not identify a unique advantage
Choose Grok Imagine Video 1.5 Lite if…
- • you need video generation
The benchmark count includes only results measured with a matching benchmark version and protocol. Arena scores are shown separately. Missing, preliminary, and incompatible data is not treated as a controlled win. Published point-score comparisons are labeled separately when protocol details are incomplete. For text-output models, the verdict also compares token pricing and context windows.
Performance benchmarks
Every value links to its source. A dash means that no reviewed result is available for that exact model and protocol.
| Benchmark | Llama 4 Maverick | Grok Imagine Video 1.5 Lite |
|---|---|---|
A 657-task benchmark of multi-step work across simulated SaaS applications in six business domains. The Artificial Analysis protocol reports a guardrail-aware score and is distinct from both the public Zapier split and the unrelated dynamic AutoBench framework. Guardrail-aware score | — | — |
A benchmark of difficult, verifiable information-seeking questions designed to measure an agent's ability to locate hard-to-find facts through web browsing. Accuracy | — | — |
A verified computer-use benchmark in which multimodal agents operate desktop applications and are graded from the resulting environment state. Mean task reward | — | — |
A human-validated subset of real GitHub issues used to measure whether a coding agent can produce repository patches that resolve the associated tests. Resolved | 21.0% SWE-bench | — |
Version 2.1 of the benchmark for completing realistic tasks in terminal environments. Harness, resource limits, and attempt count are part of the protocol. Mean task success | — | — |
A dynamic LLM evaluation framework in which models generate questions, answer them, and participate in reciprocal peer assessment. AutoBench is distinct from Zapier's AutomationBench. Weighted peer-assessment score | — | — |
The highest-quality subset of Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A, designed to test expert-level scientific reasoning in biology, physics, and chemistry. Accuracy | — | — |
A 2,500-question expert-level benchmark spanning dozens of academic fields. Tool-assisted and no-tools results are separate protocols and must not be merged. Accuracy | — | — |
Comprehensive comparison of AI models across intelligence, price, speed, and latency Intelligence Index | — |
Benchmark sources
Reviewed evidence last updated 2026-08-09.
Pricing, capabilities, and model facts
| Feature | Llama 4 Maverick | Grok Imagine Video 1.5 Lite |
|---|---|---|
| Context & model facts | ||
| Developer | Meta | xAI |
| API provider | Meta | SpaceXAI |
| Input context | 1,048,576 tokens | — |
| Maximum output | 16,384 tokens | — |
| Released | — | — |
| Added to Writingmate | Apr 5, 2025 | Oct 6, 2026 |
| License | Not available | Not available |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2024-08-31 | — |
| Capabilities | ||
| Inputs | Text, Image | Text, Image |
| Outputs | Text | Video |
| Provider endpoint accepts tool parameters | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | No | No |
| Vision | Yes | Yes |
| Image Generation | No | No |
| Video Generation | No | Yes |
| API performance | ||
| p95 latency | Not measured | Not measured |
| Output throughput | Not measured | Not measured |
| Writingmate shows API performance only when both models have enough observations from the same measurement window, prompt profile, and provider. Third-party latency values are not copied into this table. | ||
Data sources
- Writingmate model catalog (pricing, limits, and availability)
Catalog data last updated Oct 6, 2026.
Why Pay for Multiple Subscriptions?
Comparing Llama 4 Maverick from Meta with Grok Imagine Video 1.5 Lite from xAI? Instead of managing separate API keys and subscriptions, get both with Writingmate.
| Plan | Price | Llama 4 Maverick | Grok Imagine Video 1.5 Lite | AI Images | AI Video |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Writingmate Pro Most popular | $20/mo | Included | Included | Nano Banana Pro, FLUX.2, DALL-E & more | VEO 3.1, Kling 3.0 |
Writingmate Ultimate Power users | $60/mo | Included | Included | Nano Banana Pro, FLUX.2, DALL-E & more | VEO 3.1, Kling 3.0 |
Llama 4 Maverick vs Grok Imagine Video 1.5 Lite FAQ
Which is better, Llama 4 Maverick or Grok Imagine Video 1.5 Lite?
There are not enough shared, protocol-compatible benchmark results to declare a performance leader.
Which model is cheaper to use through an API?
A comparable blended token price is not available for both models. Check the API pricing rows for the values that are currently published.
Which model supports more context?
Comparable context-window data is not available for both models.
Can I switch between Llama 4 Maverick and Grok Imagine Video 1.5 Lite?
Yes. Use the model selector on this page to open any current Writingmate model comparison. You can also run the same prompt with both models in Writingmate.
Related comparisons
More Llama 4 Maverick comparisons
GPT-5
OpenAI
GPT-5 is OpenAI’s most advanced model, offering major improvements in reasoning, code quality, and user experience.
Mistral Large 4
Mistral AI
Mistral Large 4 is a frontier multimodal (text and image input) model from Mistral AI built for reasoning, coding, and agentic workloads.
Pareto 26.10 Preview
Unbiased
Pareto is a multimodal composite model built for research, coding, and agentic workflows, while delivering frontier-level performance across a broad range of general-purpose tasks.
GPT-6.1 Sol Pro
OpenAI
GPT-6.1 Sol Pro is the same underlying model as GPT-6.1 Sol, served with reasoning.mode set to pro for higher-quality responses on complex tasks.
GPT-6.1 Sol
OpenAI
GPT-6.1 Sol is an upgrade to GPT-6 Sol from OpenAI, positioned below the flagship GPT-6 Astra in the GPT-6 series.
Claude Sonnet 5.5
Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 5.5 is Anthropic's Sonnet-class model for well-scoped everyday work, succeeding Claude Sonnet 5 as a direct upgrade.
More Grok Imagine Video 1.5 Lite comparisons
HeyGen Video
HeyGen
HeyGen Video is a general-purpose video generation model from HeyGen.
H3 Max
MiniMax
MiniMax H3 Max is a video-generation model from MiniMax, jointly released with fal.ai.
Wan 3.0 Prime
Alibaba
Wan 3.0 Prime is a fast-mode variant of Wan 3.0 from Alibaba.
Wan 3.0
Alibaba
Wan 3.0 is a video generation model from Alibaba for text-to-video, image-to-video, and reference-guided video generation.
Avatar IV
HeyGen
HeyGen: Avatar IV is an image-to-video model that animates a single photo into an expressive, lip-synced talking-head video.
Seedance 2.0 Mini
ByteDance
Seedance 2.0 Mini is a video generation model from ByteDance.