MAI-Image-2.5 Pro vs Qwen Image 3 Pro: which should you choose in 2026?
MAI-Image-2.5 Pro (by Microsoft) and Qwen Image 3 Pro (by Qwen) are compared below. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price, and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.
There are not enough shared, protocol-compatible benchmark results to declare a performance leader.
Choose MAI-Image-2.5 Pro if…
- • your own prompt tests favor its output; shared comparable evidence does not identify a unique advantage
Choose Qwen Image 3 Pro if…
- • your own prompt tests favor its output; shared comparable evidence does not identify a unique advantage
The benchmark count includes only results measured with a matching benchmark version and protocol. Arena scores are shown separately. Missing, preliminary, and incompatible data is not treated as a controlled win. Published point-score comparisons are labeled separately when protocol details are incomplete. For text-output models, the verdict also compares token pricing and context windows.
Performance benchmarks
Every value links to its source. A dash means that no reviewed result is available for that exact model and protocol.
| Benchmark | MAI-Image-2.5 Pro | Qwen Image 3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
A 657-task benchmark of multi-step work across simulated SaaS applications in six business domains. The Artificial Analysis protocol reports a guardrail-aware score and is distinct from both the public Zapier split and the unrelated dynamic AutoBench framework. Guardrail-aware score | — | — |
A benchmark of difficult, verifiable information-seeking questions designed to measure an agent's ability to locate hard-to-find facts through web browsing. Accuracy | — | — |
A verified computer-use benchmark in which multimodal agents operate desktop applications and are graded from the resulting environment state. Mean task reward | — | — |
A human-validated subset of real GitHub issues used to measure whether a coding agent can produce repository patches that resolve the associated tests. Resolved | — | — |
Version 2.1 of the benchmark for completing realistic tasks in terminal environments. Harness, resource limits, and attempt count are part of the protocol. Mean task success | — | — |
A dynamic LLM evaluation framework in which models generate questions, answer them, and participate in reciprocal peer assessment. AutoBench is distinct from Zapier's AutomationBench. Weighted peer-assessment score | — | — |
The highest-quality subset of Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A, designed to test expert-level scientific reasoning in biology, physics, and chemistry. Accuracy | — | — |
A 2,500-question expert-level benchmark spanning dozens of academic fields. Tool-assisted and no-tools results are separate protocols and must not be merged. Accuracy | — | — |
Benchmark sources
Reviewed evidence last updated 2026-08-09.
Pricing, capabilities, and model facts
| Feature | MAI-Image-2.5 Pro | Qwen Image 3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Context & model facts | ||
| Developer | Microsoft | Qwen |
| API provider | Microsoft | Qwen |
| Input context | 4,096 tokens | 65,536 tokens |
| Maximum output | 1,024 tokens | — |
| Released | — | — |
| Added to Writingmate | Jul 23, 2026 | Aug 5, 2026 |
| License | Not available | Not available |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | — |
| Capabilities | ||
| Inputs | Text, Image | Text, Image |
| Outputs | Image | Image |
| Provider endpoint accepts tool parameters | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | No |
| Vision | Yes | Yes |
| Image Generation | Yes | Yes |
| Video Generation | No | No |
| API performance | ||
| p95 latency | Not measured | Not measured |
| Output throughput | Not measured | Not measured |
| Writingmate shows API performance only when both models have enough observations from the same measurement window, prompt profile, and provider. Third-party latency values are not copied into this table. | ||
Data sources
- Writingmate model catalog (pricing, limits, and availability)
Catalog data last updated Aug 5, 2026.
Why Pay for Multiple Subscriptions?
Comparing MAI-Image-2.5 Pro from Microsoft with Qwen Image 3 Pro from Qwen? Instead of managing separate API keys and subscriptions, get both with Writingmate.
| Plan | Price | MAI-Image-2.5 Pro | Qwen Image 3 Pro | AI Images | AI Video |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Writingmate Pro Most popular | $20/mo | Included | Included | Nano Banana Pro, FLUX.2, DALL-E & more | Sora 2, VEO 3.1 |
Writingmate Ultimate Power users | $60/mo | Included | Included | Nano Banana Pro, FLUX.2, DALL-E & more | Sora 2, VEO 3.1 |
MAI-Image-2.5 Pro vs Qwen Image 3 Pro FAQ
Which is better, MAI-Image-2.5 Pro or Qwen Image 3 Pro?
There are not enough shared, protocol-compatible benchmark results to declare a performance leader.
Which model is cheaper to use through an API?
A comparable blended token price is not available for both models. Check the API pricing rows for the values that are currently published.
Which model supports more context?
Comparable context-window data is not available for both models.
Can I switch between MAI-Image-2.5 Pro and Qwen Image 3 Pro?
Yes. Use the model selector on this page to open any current Writingmate model comparison. You can also run the same prompt with both models in Writingmate.
Related comparisons
More MAI-Image-2.5 Pro comparisons
Qwen Image 3
Qwen
Qwen Image 3 is a unified image generation and editing model from Qwen.
Krea 2 Large
Krea
Krea 2 Large is Krea's high-capability image generation model, more than twice the size of Krea 2 Medium.
Krea 2 Medium
Krea
Krea 2 Medium is Krea's balanced, cost-efficient image generation model and a practical starting point for a broad range of use cases.
Krea 2 Medium Turbo
Krea
Krea 2 Medium Turbo is a distilled, speed-focused variant of Krea 2 Medium from Krea.
GPT Image 1 Mini
OpenAI
A cost-efficient variant of GPT Image 1 for high-quality image generation at reduced latency and cost via OpenAI's dedicated Images API.
Riverflow V2.5 Pro
Sourceful
Riverflow V2.5 Pro is the most powerful variant of Sourceful's Riverflow 2.5 lineup, best for top-tier control and quality-sensitive outputs.
More Qwen Image 3 Pro comparisons
Krea 2 Large
Krea
Krea 2 Large is Krea's high-capability image generation model, more than twice the size of Krea 2 Medium.
Krea 2 Medium
Krea
Krea 2 Medium is Krea's balanced, cost-efficient image generation model and a practical starting point for a broad range of use cases.
Krea 2 Medium Turbo
Krea
Krea 2 Medium Turbo is a distilled, speed-focused variant of Krea 2 Medium from Krea.
GPT Image 1 Mini
OpenAI
A cost-efficient variant of GPT Image 1 for high-quality image generation at reduced latency and cost via OpenAI's dedicated Images API.
Riverflow V2.5 Pro
Sourceful
Riverflow V2.5 Pro is the most powerful variant of Sourceful's Riverflow 2.5 lineup, best for top-tier control and quality-sensitive outputs.
Riverflow V2.5 Fast
Sourceful
Riverflow V2.5 Fast is the speed-optimized variant of Sourceful's Riverflow 2.5 lineup, best for production deployments and latency-critical workflows.