Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash vs Recraft V4: which should you choose in 2026?
Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash (by Google) and Recraft V4 (by Recraft) are compared below. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price, and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.
There are not enough shared, protocol-compatible benchmark results to declare a performance leader.
Choose Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash if…
- • you need a model with explicit reasoning support
- • you need video generation
Choose Recraft V4 if…
- • you need image generation
The benchmark count includes only results measured with a matching benchmark version and protocol. Arena scores are shown separately. Missing, preliminary, and incompatible data is not treated as a controlled win. Published point-score comparisons are labeled separately when protocol details are incomplete. For text-output models, the verdict also compares token pricing and context windows.
Performance benchmarks
Every value links to its source. A dash means that no reviewed result is available for that exact model and protocol.
| Benchmark | Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash | Recraft V4 |
|---|---|---|
A 657-task benchmark of multi-step work across simulated SaaS applications in six business domains. The Artificial Analysis protocol reports a guardrail-aware score and is distinct from both the public Zapier split and the unrelated dynamic AutoBench framework. Guardrail-aware score | — | — |
A benchmark of difficult, verifiable information-seeking questions designed to measure an agent's ability to locate hard-to-find facts through web browsing. Accuracy | — | — |
A verified computer-use benchmark in which multimodal agents operate desktop applications and are graded from the resulting environment state. Mean task reward | — | — |
A human-validated subset of real GitHub issues used to measure whether a coding agent can produce repository patches that resolve the associated tests. Resolved | — | — |
Version 2.1 of the benchmark for completing realistic tasks in terminal environments. Harness, resource limits, and attempt count are part of the protocol. Mean task success | — | — |
A dynamic LLM evaluation framework in which models generate questions, answer them, and participate in reciprocal peer assessment. AutoBench is distinct from Zapier's AutomationBench. Weighted peer-assessment score | — | — |
The highest-quality subset of Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A, designed to test expert-level scientific reasoning in biology, physics, and chemistry. Accuracy | — | — |
A 2,500-question expert-level benchmark spanning dozens of academic fields. Tool-assisted and no-tools results are separate protocols and must not be merged. Accuracy | — | — |
| Arena preference scores | ||
Human preference score for generated images | — | 1115 ±3 |
Benchmark sources
Reviewed evidence last updated 2026-08-09. Arena data last refreshed Oct 5, 2026.
Pricing, capabilities, and model facts
| Feature | Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash | Recraft V4 |
|---|---|---|
| Context & model facts | ||
| Developer | Recraft | |
| API provider | Recraft | |
| Input context | 131,072 tokens | 65,536 tokens |
| Maximum output | 65,536 tokens | 58,982 tokens |
| Released | — | — |
| Added to Writingmate | Nov 5, 2026 | May 7, 2026 |
| License | Not available | Not available |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | — |
| Capabilities | ||
| Inputs | Text, Image, Video | Text, Image |
| Outputs | Text, Video | Image |
| Provider endpoint accepts tool parameters | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | No |
| Vision | Yes | Yes |
| Image Generation | No | Yes |
| Video Generation | Yes | No |
| API performance | ||
| p95 latency | Not measured | Not measured |
| Output throughput | Not measured | Not measured |
| Writingmate shows API performance only when both models have enough observations from the same measurement window, prompt profile, and provider. Third-party latency values are not copied into this table. | ||
Data sources
- Writingmate model catalog (pricing, limits, and availability)
Catalog data last updated Nov 5, 2026.
Why Pay for Multiple Subscriptions?
Comparing Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash from Google with Recraft V4 from Recraft? Instead of managing separate API keys and subscriptions, get both with Writingmate.
| Plan | Price | Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash | Recraft V4 | AI Images | AI Video |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Writingmate Pro Most popular | $20/mo | Included | Included | Nano Banana Pro, FLUX.2, DALL-E & more | VEO 3.1, Kling 3.0 |
Writingmate Ultimate Power users | $60/mo | Included | Included | Nano Banana Pro, FLUX.2, DALL-E & more | VEO 3.1, Kling 3.0 |
Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash vs Recraft V4 FAQ
Which is better, Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash or Recraft V4?
There are not enough shared, protocol-compatible benchmark results to declare a performance leader.
Which model is cheaper to use through an API?
A comparable blended token price is not available for both models. Check the API pricing rows for the values that are currently published.
Which model supports more context?
Comparable context-window data is not available for both models.
Can I switch between Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash and Recraft V4?
Yes. Use the model selector on this page to open any current Writingmate model comparison. You can also run the same prompt with both models in Writingmate.
Related comparisons
More Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash comparisons
Crouton Alpha
Stealth
Crouton Alpha is a lightweight model built for scalable coding, agentic, and multimodal workflows.
GLM 5.3 FlashX Legal
Z.AI
GLM-5.3-FlashX-Legal (GLM-Legal) is Z.ai's legal-domain variant of GLM-5.3-FlashX, a native multimodal model that accepts text, image, and video input and produces text.
Kimi K3.1 Pro
Moonshot AI
Kimi K3.1 Pro is Moonshot AI's flagship open-weight multimodal reasoning model and a post-trained successor to Kimi K3, with a 1M-token context window.
MiniMax M3.1 Flash
MiniMax
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is a multimodal model from MiniMax.
Glimpse
Elorian
Glimpse is a multimodal visual reasoning model from Elorian, built for visual understanding and complex visual reasoning in the physical world.
Muse Spark Open
Meta
Muse Spark Open is a coding-optimized open-weight model.
More Recraft V4 comparisons
Riverflow V2.6 Pro
Sourceful
Riverflow V2.6 Pro is a model by Sourceful.
Qwen Image 2.1 Turbo
Qwen
Qwen Image 2.1 Turbo is a model by Qwen.
Qwen Image 2.1 Pro
Qwen
Qwen Image 2.1 Pro is an image generation and editing model from Qwen, the higher-quality tier of the Qwen Image 2.1 series.
K3 Edit
Krea
Krea K3 Edit is an image-to-image editing model from Krea.
FLUX 3 Image Klein
Black Forest Labs
FLUX 3 Image Klein is an open-weights image generation and editing model from Black Forest Labs.
Hy Image 3.5 Preview
Tencent
Hy Image 3.5 Preview is a unified image generation and editing model from Tencent.