WritingmateWritingmate
Model Comparison

Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Nex-N2.6Which Is Better in 2026?

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B logoGoogle•
Nex AGI

Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Nex-N2.6: which should you choose in 2026?

Gemma 4 26B A4B (by Google) and Nex-N2.6 (by Nex AGI) are compared below. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price, and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

There are not enough shared, protocol-compatible benchmark results to declare a performance leader.

Gemma 4 26B A4B is about 2.2× cheaper on a blended 3:1 input/output basis ($0.085 vs $0.19 per 1M tokens).

Choose Gemma 4 26B A4B if…

  • • lower blended API cost matters for your workload

Choose Nex-N2.6 if…

  • • your own prompt tests favor its output; shared comparable evidence does not identify a unique advantage

The benchmark count includes only results measured with a matching benchmark version and protocol. Arena scores are shown separately. Missing, preliminary, and incompatible data is not treated as a controlled win. Published point-score comparisons are labeled separately when protocol details are incomplete. For text-output models, the verdict also compares token pricing and context windows.

Chat with both models
vs

Performance benchmarks

Every value links to its source. A dash means that no reviewed result is available for that exact model and protocol.

Gemma 4 26B A4B and Nex-N2.6 benchmark results
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4BNex-N2.6
AutomationBench-AA

A 657-task benchmark of multi-step work across simulated SaaS applications in six business domains. The Artificial Analysis protocol reports a guardrail-aware score and is distinct from both the public Zapier split and the unrelated dynamic AutoBench framework.

Guardrail-aware score

——
BrowseComp

A benchmark of difficult, verifiable information-seeking questions designed to measure an agent's ability to locate hard-to-find facts through web browsing.

Accuracy

——
OSWorld-Verified

A verified computer-use benchmark in which multimodal agents operate desktop applications and are graded from the resulting environment state.

Mean task reward

——
SWE-Bench Verified

A human-validated subset of real GitHub issues used to measure whether a coding agent can produce repository patches that resolve the associated tests.

Resolved

——
Terminal-Bench 2.1

Version 2.1 of the benchmark for completing realistic tasks in terminal environments. Harness, resource limits, and attempt count are part of the protocol.

Mean task success

——
AutoBench

A dynamic LLM evaluation framework in which models generate questions, answer them, and participate in reciprocal peer assessment. AutoBench is distinct from Zapier's AutomationBench.

Weighted peer-assessment score

——
GPQA Diamond

The highest-quality subset of Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A, designed to test expert-level scientific reasoning in biology, physics, and chemistry.

Accuracy

——
Humanity's Last Exam

A 2,500-question expert-level benchmark spanning dozens of academic fields. Tool-assisted and no-tools results are separate protocols and must not be merged.

Accuracy

——

Benchmark sources

    Reviewed evidence last updated 2026-08-09.

    Pricing, capabilities, and model facts

    Gemma 4 26B A4B and Nex-N2.6 model facts
    FeatureGemma 4 26B A4BNex-N2.6
    Context & model facts
    DeveloperGoogleNex AGI
    API providerGoogleNex AGI
    Input context262,144 tokens262,144 tokens
    Maximum output128,000 tokens235,929 tokens
    Released——
    Added to WritingmateApr 3, 2026Nov 10, 2026
    LicenseNot availableNot available
    Knowledge cutoff——
    Capabilities
    InputsImage, Text, VideoText, Image
    OutputsTextText
    Provider endpoint accepts tool parametersYesYes
    ReasoningYesYes
    VisionYesYes
    Image GenerationNoNo
    Video GenerationNoNo
    API pricing
    Input (per 1M tokens)$0.08$0.12
    Output (per 1M tokens)$0.10$0.40
    Blended 3:1 input/output$0.085$0.19
    API performance
    p95 latencyNot measuredNot measured
    Output throughputNot measuredNot measured
    Writingmate shows API performance only when both models have enough observations from the same measurement window, prompt profile, and provider. Third-party latency values are not copied into this table.

    Data sources

    • Writingmate model catalog (pricing, limits, and availability)

    Catalog data last updated Nov 10, 2026.

    Why Pay for Multiple Subscriptions?

    Comparing Gemma 4 26B A4B from Google with Nex-N2.6 from Nex AGI? Instead of managing separate API keys and subscriptions, get both with Writingmate.

    Subscription-plan access for Gemma 4 26B A4B and Nex-N2.6
    PlanPriceGemma 4 26B A4BNex-N2.6AI ImagesAI Video
    Writingmate Pro
    Most popular
    		$20/moIncludedIncludedNano Banana Pro, FLUX.2, DALL-E & moreVEO 3.1, Kling 3.0
    Writingmate Ultimate
    Power users
    		$60/moIncludedIncludedNano Banana Pro, FLUX.2, DALL-E & moreVEO 3.1, Kling 3.0
    View Plans & Pricing

    Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Nex-N2.6 FAQ

    Which is better, Gemma 4 26B A4B or Nex-N2.6?

    There are not enough shared, protocol-compatible benchmark results to declare a performance leader. Gemma 4 26B A4B is about 2.2× cheaper on a blended 3:1 input/output basis ($0.085 vs $0.19 per 1M tokens).

    Which model is cheaper to use through an API?

    Gemma 4 26B A4B is about 2.2× cheaper on a blended 3:1 input/output basis ($0.085 vs $0.19 per 1M tokens).

    Which model supports more context?

    The published context windows are close enough that this page does not treat the difference as a material advantage.

    Can I switch between Gemma 4 26B A4B and Nex-N2.6?

    Yes. Use the model selector on this page to open any current Writingmate model comparison. You can also run the same prompt with both models in Writingmate.