DeepSeek V3 0324 vs GPT-5: which should you choose in 2026?
DeepSeek V3 0324 (by DeepSeek) and GPT-5 (by OpenAI) are compared below. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price, and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.
There are not enough shared, protocol-compatible benchmark results to declare a performance leader.
DeepSeek V3 0324 is about 7.9× cheaper on a blended 3:1 input/output basis ($0.4375 vs $3.44 per 1M tokens).
GPT-5 has the larger context window (400,000 tokens vs 163,840 tokens).
Choose DeepSeek V3 0324 if…
- • lower blended API cost matters for your workload
Choose GPT-5 if…
- • you work with longer documents, transcripts, or codebases
- • you need a model with explicit reasoning support
- • you need image inputs
The benchmark count includes only results measured with a matching benchmark version and protocol. Arena scores are shown separately. Missing, preliminary, and incompatible data is not treated as a controlled win. Published point-score comparisons are labeled separately when protocol details are incomplete. For text-output models, the verdict also compares token pricing and context windows.
Performance benchmarks
Every value links to its source. A dash means that no reviewed result is available for that exact model and protocol.
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V3 0324 | GPT-5 |
|---|---|---|
A 657-task benchmark of multi-step work across simulated SaaS applications in six business domains. The Artificial Analysis protocol reports a guardrail-aware score and is distinct from both the public Zapier split and the unrelated dynamic AutoBench framework. Guardrail-aware score | — | — |
A benchmark of difficult, verifiable information-seeking questions designed to measure an agent's ability to locate hard-to-find facts through web browsing. Accuracy | — | — |
A verified computer-use benchmark in which multimodal agents operate desktop applications and are graded from the resulting environment state. Mean task reward | — | — |
A human-validated subset of real GitHub issues used to measure whether a coding agent can produce repository patches that resolve the associated tests. Resolved Protocols differ or are incompletely disclosed; not counted as a controlled win | 60.0% www.swebench.com | 65.0% SWE-bench |
Version 2.1 of the benchmark for completing realistic tasks in terminal environments. Harness, resource limits, and attempt count are part of the protocol. Mean task success | — | — |
A dynamic LLM evaluation framework in which models generate questions, answer them, and participate in reciprocal peer assessment. AutoBench is distinct from Zapier's AutomationBench. Weighted peer-assessment score | — | — |
The highest-quality subset of Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A, designed to test expert-level scientific reasoning in biology, physics, and chemistry. Accuracy | — | — |
A 2,500-question expert-level benchmark spanning dozens of academic fields. Tool-assisted and no-tools results are separate protocols and must not be merged. Accuracy | — | — |
30 problems from the 2025 American Invitational Mathematics Examination testing olympiad-level math reasoning Accuracy % | — | 50.23 matharena.ai |
Challenging math contest benchmark featuring the most difficult olympiad-level problems Accuracy % | — | 50.23 matharena.ai |
Benchmark sources
Reviewed evidence last updated 2026-08-09.
Pricing, capabilities, and model facts
| Feature | DeepSeek V3 0324 | GPT-5 |
|---|---|---|
| Context & model facts | ||
| Developer | DeepSeek | OpenAI |
| API provider | DeepSeek | OpenAI |
| Input context | 163,840 tokens | 400,000 tokens |
| Maximum output | 163,840 tokens | 128,000 tokens |
| Released | — | — |
| Added to Writingmate | Mar 24, 2025 | Aug 7, 2025 |
| License | Not available | Not available |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2024-07-31 | 2024-09-30 |
| Capabilities | ||
| Inputs | Text | Text, Image, File |
| Outputs | Text | Text |
| Provider endpoint accepts tool parameters | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | No | Yes |
| Vision | No | Yes |
| Image Generation | No | No |
| Video Generation | No | No |
| API pricing | ||
| Input (per 1M tokens) | $0.25 | $1.25 |
| Output (per 1M tokens) | $1.00 | $10.00 |
| Blended 3:1 input/output | $0.4375 | $3.44 |
| API performance | ||
| p95 latency | Not measured | Not measured |
| Output throughput | Not measured | Not measured |
| Writingmate shows API performance only when both models have enough observations from the same measurement window, prompt profile, and provider. Third-party latency values are not copied into this table. | ||
Data sources
- Writingmate model catalog (pricing, limits, and availability)
Catalog data last updated Aug 7, 2025.
Why Pay for Multiple Subscriptions?
Comparing DeepSeek V3 0324 from DeepSeek with GPT-5 from OpenAI? Instead of managing separate API keys and subscriptions, get both with Writingmate.
| Plan | Price | DeepSeek V3 0324 | GPT-5 | AI Images | AI Video |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Writingmate Pro Most popular | $20/mo | Included | Included | Nano Banana Pro, FLUX.2, DALL-E & more | Sora 2, VEO 3.1 |
Writingmate Ultimate Power users | $60/mo | Included | Included | Nano Banana Pro, FLUX.2, DALL-E & more | Sora 2, VEO 3.1 |
DeepSeek V3 0324 vs GPT-5 FAQ
Which is better, DeepSeek V3 0324 or GPT-5?
There are not enough shared, protocol-compatible benchmark results to declare a performance leader. DeepSeek V3 0324 is about 7.9× cheaper on a blended 3:1 input/output basis ($0.4375 vs $3.44 per 1M tokens). GPT-5 has the larger context window (400,000 tokens vs 163,840 tokens).
Which model is cheaper to use through an API?
DeepSeek V3 0324 is about 7.9× cheaper on a blended 3:1 input/output basis ($0.4375 vs $3.44 per 1M tokens).
Which model supports more context?
GPT-5 has the larger context window (400,000 tokens vs 163,840 tokens).
Can I switch between DeepSeek V3 0324 and GPT-5?
Yes. Use the model selector on this page to open any current Writingmate model comparison. You can also run the same prompt with both models in Writingmate.
Related comparisons
More DeepSeek V3 0324 comparisons
Ox Alpha
Stealth
Ox Alpha is a reasoning model designed for coding, sustained agentic work, and production workloads.
Hy-MT2-1.8B
Tencent
Hy-MT2-1.8B is a compact 1.8B-parameter translation model from Tencent.
Hy-MT2-30B-A3B
Tencent
Hy-MT2-30B-A3B is Tencent's flagship translation model in the Hy-MT2 family.
GLM 5.3
Z.AI
GLM-5.3 is a large-scale reasoning model from Z.ai, built for complex software engineering and long-horizon agent tasks.
Qwen3.8 27B
Qwen
Qwen3.8 27B is an open-weight dense vision-language model from Qwen.
Gemini 3.7 Flash
Gemini 3.7 Flash is a multimodal model from Google for fast agentic workflows, coding, and complex multi-step reasoning.
More GPT-5 comparisons
Claude Opus 4.5
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.5 is Anthropic’s frontier reasoning model optimized for complex software engineering, agentic workflows, and long-horizon computer use.
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro is Google’s state-of-the-art AI model designed for advanced reasoning, coding, mathematics, and scientific tasks.
Claude Sonnet 4
Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 4 significantly enhances the capabilities of its predecessor, Sonnet 3.7, excelling in both coding and reasoning tasks with improved precision and controllability.
R1
DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 is here: Performance on par with OpenAI o1, but open-sourced and with fully open reasoning tokens.
Gemini 3.7 Flash
Gemini 3.7 Flash is a multimodal model from Google for fast agentic workflows, coding, and complex multi-step reasoning.